Installed and registered without problems on a Win 8.1 Pro 64 bit system, just to see, if there is something new or changed.

A Russian company with address&phone from Smolensk.

We had many programs from this company. Basically all the same in different flavors. A bit like icecream. If you don’t like vanilla, you’ll get banana.

Easy Digital Photo Recovery 3.0 November 2, 2014
Easy File Undelete 3.0 September 30, 2014
Easy Office Recovery 2.0 September 1, 2014
Easy Mail Recovery 2.0 July 4, 2014
Easy Archive Recovery 2.0 June 3, 2014
Easy Drive Data Recovery 3.0 May 13, 2014
Easy Digital Photo Recovery 3.0 April 21, 2014
Easy File Undelete 3.0 March 6, 2014
Easy Office Recovery 2.0 February 17, 2014
MunSoft Data Recovery Suite 2.0 January 15, 2014
Easy Archive Recovery 2.0 October 16, 2013
Easy Drive Data Recovery 3.0 August 27, 2013

Despite of the many variants, this is still a good an reliable software. With the time, you can collect all variants – like stamps. I’m neither a stamp collector nor a software variants collector.

If you don’t have already such a program, you can keep it.

The program has changed, even if it is the "same" version 3.0. Dear developer, isn't it time to rename this to 3.1 or 3.2?

The program size changed from 3.679.008 Bytes (date 16.12.2013) to 3.759.392 Bytes (date 28.11.2014), updated are the help files. It makes sense to update your (probably) existing Easy drive Data recovery.

I updated my installed, but never used version.

Karl  –  9 years ago  –  ¿Te ha parecido útil este comentario? si | no (+145)

Traducir

For data recovory I have been using Freeware Undelete360 Portable regularly and Recuva Portable sometime.
I found Undelete360 to be more efficient than Recuva in some cases.
But to my surprise "WinUtilities Undelete" another freeware data recovery tool has impressed me and also outclassed during an operation . While Undelete360 and Recuva indicating some files as 'overwritten' (not recoverable) then in 'WinUtilities Undelete' those files were marked as 'good' and the files were easily recovered in very good and healthy condition. No files were corrupted.

Another difference with other is it's Explorer-based directory structure, you can easily navigate folders on your hard drive to view recoverable files.
Also you can recover folders / files which are hidden by any folder locker software.

http://www.ylcomputing.com/content/view/350/153

http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Back-Up-and-Recovery/WinUtilities-Undelete.shtml

Jahid  –  9 years ago  –  ¿Te ha parecido útil este comentario? si | no (+82)

Traducir

Tend to download a lot of the BBC IPlayer files that are very large; over the past few years have attempted to recover a few mistakenly deleted because of a combination of being rather dithery and difficulty seeing.
Attempts to recover were taken immediately after their deletion and yet have had absolutely no success even though I keep my pagefile to a set size, to minimise fragmentation, and drive defragmented.
Then it dawned on me as to why, simple really my drive is so full that it is almost inevitable that anything deleted will be overwritten rather quickly.
So it looks like when you get to this stage regarding space it is rather pointless attempting recovery no matter how good or bad the recovery program.

XP-Man  –  9 years ago  –  ¿Te ha parecido útil este comentario? si | no (+45)

Traducir

The following is a link to 5 free portable recovery software programs , probably worth keeping on a small thumb drive.
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/five-apps/five-free-portable-recovery-tools/

XP-Man  –  9 years ago  –  ¿Te ha parecido útil este comentario? si | no (+39)

Traducir

I'm wondering with "caution"...that is this the type of recovery software that is best "NOT" to install it on the drive you are planning to recover your lost files? Anyone??...

Studiopro  –  9 years ago  –  ¿Te ha parecido útil este comentario? si | no (+4)

Traducir

That is correct. When possible, you should never install it on the drive you want to recover.
If you do, some of the file pointers will get messed up and possibly, what you want to recover,
will be overwritten. Best to install it as a portable app to a flash drive if you can, or install it
on a good computer and slave your bad drive to do the recovery.

That is correct. When possible, you should never install it on the drive you want to recover. If you do, some of the file pointers will get messed up and possibly, what you want to recover, will be overwritten. Best to install it as a portable app to a flash drive if you can, or install it on a good computer and slave your bad drive to do the recovery.
Save | Cancel

bruce  –  9 years ago  –  ¿Te ha parecido útil este comentario? si | no (+25)

Traducir